jump to navigation

Back-Flips: A modern epidemic evolved from ancient symptoms. July 5, 2009

Posted by thebigfundamental in NBA.
Tags: ,
6 comments

Swine flu is officially a global pandemic. Turn on your TV and media is going crazy because a person living in a iron lung, almost dead anyway, just died from swine flu (ps no disrespect to any of the families who lost members to Swine Flu – i’m having a go a media sensationalism, not the dead) and now we should cower in the cellar living off tinned SPAM and army food while waiting for deliverance. Swine flu is like normal flu. In fact, it’s hardly changed. In fact, it’s no more deadly the “normal” flu. It’s just a hell of a lot more contagious. That’s all. THAT IS ALL. This type of contagion is analogous to what we’re seeing in the NBA at present. I’m not referring to players having kissing parties and then leaving with a minor viral infection (that’s college, not the NBA), I just mean there is an “epidemic” of sorts in the NBA at the moment that’s highly contagious, and has evolved from something deep in history. I’m talking about “back-flips,” or players agreeing to deals here, then not telling anyone and SIGNING there.

What do JOsh Childress and Swine-Flu have in common?

What do JOsh Childress and Swine-Flu have in common?

Its hard to call the NBA some sort of ethical competition, at least now in mordern times when players only show loaylty to the “benjamins” and constantly quote supposedly reasonable diatribes like “I gotta get paid“. In fact, forget the benjamins, as Josh Childress showed last year, players are now chasing the euro, the yen, and anything else they can get their hands on. And us, the fans, are left here wondering why these crazy things are going on. But I’m here to tell you, this current ”epidemic” of players chasing the $$$ is only the product of something that’s been going on for ages. It’s only now that the “symptoms” have manifested themselves into a disease. Let me explain…

Last year we sat gob-smacked when Josh Childress, one of the best 6th men in the NBA, went to Europe to play because he didn’t get the “love” he thought he deserved from his Atlanta Hawks. The Atlanta Hawks thought he was “option-less” having turned down offers from other teams, so they offered him a minimum salary. Childress then played his ace in the hole, and made off for Olympiakos, Greece. The Greeks were smiling while the Atlanta Hawks and the NBA, were not.  Childress’ behaviour that off-season was nothing new. Plenty of NBA players have toyed with the Euroleauge and its salary cap free management style. Only 2 season ago Sarunas Jasikavicius turned down an offer similar to his expired contract to go back to Spain. We raised no eyebrows then, but why? Didn’t Jasikavicius do the same thing as Childress? Yes, BUT, Jasikavicius if from Europe and not the NBA, he didn’t attend college, and his isn’t American. Ok so Americans are racist and self-centred, what’s new-  this still doesn’t explain the Childress move. The answer is, Childress simply went chasing the $$$. Nothing more, nothing less. For him, basketball had morphed COMPLETELY into a job and he saw nothing inethical in taking the highest offer possible, even if it meant playing in a less competitive league. The attitude behind the Childress move is disturbing. It questions the fundametnal reasoning why we play sport, and whether professional athleticism is more professional, or more athleticism. To understand why such a genetic mutation of thinking has become normailty we must first take a history lesson:

JR Holden never dreamed of this kind of success after leaving college undrafted

JR Holden never dreamed of this kind of success after leaving college undrafted

Jon Robert Holden is an American with dual Russian/American citizenship. He played college ball at the small Bucknell University where he dominated at the PG position. He was undrafted, graduated with a business management degree and went into “the real world” to get a job. Holden got a knock on his door (or it could have been a phone call, I’m not 100% sure, but we all know that “knock on his door” is metaphorical… Metaphors should seldom be explained… Anyway…) from a Latvian basketball scout and 6 months later Holden was playing basketball in Latvia earning $2550 Latvian a week. The reason Holden dropped his “real world” job was because there was no way he could have earned that money working in a graduate position. Also, Holden had wanted to get into the NBA – he loved basketball but wasn’t NBA level according to the draft.  J.R. Holden has been playing in Europe for the last 8 years now, and in Russia for the past 6 years. Not only did he jump straight from College to Europe, but shortly after dominating in Latvia, he also jumped straight from College to the Russian national team!!!! Holden was labelled a traitor, and has been smeared by any/all media outside of Europe. What people fail to see is that Holden did nothing inethical, even though Americans label him treacherous for playing for another country, because Holden had exhausted his basketball future in the USA so Europe was a logical step, especially when they came “knocking at his door”. Fact is Holden was the first, the initial trailblazer who set all that we currently see in motion and furthermore, and history would have it, he hasn’t been the last.

Fast-forward 10 years and Hedo Turkgolu just agreed in principle to a deal with the Portland Trailblazers for ~50 mill over 5 years. The deal was official enough that ESPN and other reputable blogs and sources were reporting the deal as “99.99% done.” Shame about that 0.01%, it can still come back to bite you. Hedo’s agent got an “11th hour” call (probably 11:59:59 is more accurate it was sooooo late) from Toronto GM Brian Colangelo offering a minor $3million more over 5 years (~$600,000/year) and Turkgolu did a 180, and changed his verbal agreement to Toronto before Portland had any idea what happened. Unlike Holden and his dual citzenship, this is inethical.

ONce adversaries, now friends. Turkgolu joins Bosh in Toronto.

ONce adversaries, now friends. Turkgolu joins Bosh in Toronto.

This is inethical because Turkgolu was in an agreement with Portland and should have, at least, contacted them to say he was having a change of heart. Portland would still have been upset, but now they could either offer Hedo more money, or at least understand why he’d made his decision, and have to respect him for it. Now no respect is needed as Turkgolu dehumanised the Trailblazers and left it to his agent/attorney to face the media. Anytime your “attorney” has to do the talking says volumes about what has just happened. Lon Babby, Hedo Turkgolu’s attorney, was quoted as saying ”… it’s perfectly understandable is Portland feel agreived.” Agents never say that. It’s always “X is a strgoner place than Y” or “Y suited Hedo better and we thank all the other offers but this is where he wanted to be.” But no, as he shal henceforth be know, HeDON”T” Turkgolu just handpassed it off to his agent who was left to make the usual passing remarks about family etc. You’d have to be a complete “Boozer” (yes this is a pun referring to Carlos Boozer dumping Cleveland in a similar manner…. You should never have to explain puns…. Anyway….) to “Elton Brand” this as being ethical. But as the puns in the former sentece suggest, this is merely an growing epidemic that, like swine flu, is now beyond containment, and has evlolved into something nasty from something nice (in the case of JR Holden).

Boozer (left) and Marbury (right) have opitimized the "gotta get paid" culture of the modern NBA

Boozer (left) and Marbury (right) have opitimized the "gotta get paid" culture of the modern NBA

But like swine-flu, this is also being hyped by the media. HeDON’T Turkgolu’s situation IS differnt to Carlos Boozer, Elton Brand, Darius Miles, Stephon Marbury etc because Turkoglu WASN’T chasing the money. Yes he accepted a deal worth $600,000 more per year (a pittance for any NBA team), BUT he and his wife had for a long time seen Toronto as being an ideal city for their family with it’s family values and most importantly, large Turkish community. But he still stuffed-up by not showing Portland due respect, and now he will be tarnished with the same brush as those mentioned above. A shame really, as for once a player did something for less than money.

I think the NBA is on the verge here. Turkgolu’s situation is being labelled as swine-flu, when really it was just a “common cold”, a mistake if you will, that could cost him his reputation. Players running overseas to Europe for money, not accepting buyouts when they know they’re onyl damaging the team/organization by sitting on the bench and absorbing money, opting out of contract so teams can re-sign them and another star then doing a runner to another team – these are all swine-flu symptoms. The GFC is forcing the salary cap down so teams can afford less, but certain teams with rich owners are flaunting luxury tax and purchasing big names for a pittance plus a bag of chips – thse are also swine-flu symptoms. I never thought I’d say it, but now like soccer, you can buy a championship in the NBA. And for the NBA this would be the equivalent of a full blown epidemic. I just hope the NBA notices the real syptoms before conatinment is breached.

Big movements…. And many more to come in Detroit at least! July 2, 2009

Posted by thebigfundamental in NBA.
1 comment so far

Written by TBF

Today we saw several interesting moves in the NBA off-season spectacular:

  • Charlie V and Ben Gordon are headed to Detroit
  • Michael Curry is leaving Detroit
  • Joe Dumars wants a new coach in Detroit by Thursday

So there’s lots going on in Detroit but now the “rebuildingDetroit have an interesting issue: Rip Hamilton

Rip Hamilton: the CURRENT starting SG of the Detroit Pistons. But for how long?

Rip Hamilton: the CURRENT starting SG of the Detroit Pistons. But for how long?

Rip wasn’t super happy last season when the Pistons acquired Allen Iverson by trade and was openly vocal when asked to try a stint as 6th man. Once again, Hamilton finds himself in a situation where, depending on the new coach, he could see his minutes diminished thanks to the presence of Gordon. And neither Hamilton nor Gordon has PG tendencies meaning that Rodney Stuckey will be free to run the point again.

Hamilton VS Gordon

Comparing these two is like comparing clones, only that Gordon is much younger than Hamilton and on the up and up, whilst Hamilton seems on a steady decline. In this head to head I’ll make it simple Gordon/Hamilton to answer a question we should ponder later on…

Age: Advantage Gordon. Gordon turns 26 this year whilst Hamilton is 31. Gordon is hitting his prime after a standout season whilst Hamilton seems to be on the decline since Chauncey left.

Scoring: Advantage Gordon. Gordon averaged 20.7 ppg last season on ~46% shooting & ~41% shooting from downtown. This was up on his previous season and closing in on his standout 2007 season where he won the 6th man of the year award. Hamilton, on the other hand, averaged 18.3 ppg on ~45% shooting and ~37% from downtown.  Hamiltons offense was sporadic at best.

Defense: Advantage Gordon. Why? “Neither play D” I hear you say? Well actually Gordon plays more minutes than Hamilton explaining his slightly higher turnover rate but still steals the ball much more frequently. Gordon also played all 82 games whereas Hamilton only played 67 meaning Gordon was more consistent.

So, as I suggested earlier, we’re not at the point of answering the Hamilton VS Gordon question and its clear that Gordon is the man for the SG position for the Pistons for all 5 years of his contract. And…. He should start. But what of Rip? Will he not be upset with this? In a word, YES!!! Which is why I suggest shipping the fella out of Detroit. He’s been lovely, but BG is the future alongside Stuckey and Hamilton is going to be as much trouble as Iverson was (thank god he’s gone as well!!!).

When Chauncey was in Detroit Rip was at his best, and happy. Now it seems, like Chauncey, Rips best basketball could be somewhere outside Detroit.

When Chauncey was in Detroit Rip was at his best, and happy. Now it seems, like Chauncey, Rips best basketball could be somewhere outside Detroit.

Where too for “Rip-City“?

Rip is a productive SG in the right situation and still has plenty to offer. If you want offense in a structured setting he can makes plays all night long. But which coach could offer such a setting? Here are a couple of suggestions:

  • Larry Brown (CHA): Brown coached Hamilton at Detroit and got the best out of him. Brown trades for former players ALL THE TIME and Charlotte have a need at the 2 spot. I can personally see a trade involving Hamilton and Okafor happening.
  • Nate McMillan (POR): No one is off limits for the Blazers and we all know Roy could easily run the point. This would be made even easier again if they manage to acquire Hedo Turkgolu who is a 6’11 PG.
  • Byron Scott (NOH): Tyson Chandler is on the outer and we all know Chris Paul can make anyone look good. The question here would be making it work with big men to balance the loss of Chandler.
  • Mike D’Antoni (NYK): The D’Antoni system suits jump-shooters. Rip is a pure jump shooter. Nuf sed. A trade for David Lee could happen or even Nate Robinson who CAN come off the bench.
  • Eddie Jordan (PHI): If they can re-sign Miller this could be a very solid lineup. They may have to part with Dalambert to get Hamilton but I don’t think that would upset the culture at Philly if you catch my drift…

So as you can see there are lots of options out there for trading Rip Hamilton and I do see this as a somewhat foregone conclusion given that Ben Gordon would not have signed in Detroit without some promise from Joe Dumars regarding minutes & “love”. Gordon could have stayed in Chicago for the same money and been a backup on a more successful team so without incentive, this deal makes no sense.

What will be interesting to see in the coming days/weeks is a how the ENTIRE free-agent landscape changes, as this will, in my humble opinion, affect the possibilities for where Hamilton could go. For example, if Larry Brown gets Allen Iverson to come and play in Charlotte for peanuts then Detroit can forget a deal with Charlotte. Thats just one scenario – Turkgolu, Ariza, Miller etc could all affect where Hamilton ends up.

Free agent time is fun. But watching a team put together a new dynamic that has the potential of doing things is even more interesting. Joe Dumars can be a mastermind sometimes and is often one step ahead of the competition. This is where the inspiration for this piece came from because if I think like Joe D, then Hamilton is as good as gone. WHERE is the fun part.


The Team of the ’00′s: The San Antonio Spurs… An openly biased argument. June 29, 2009

Posted by thebigfundamental in NBA.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Written by TBF

Hello. How about that drive in? Guess that’s why they call it Sin City… Sorry I’ve been waiting for ages to use that in a truly public setting. If you haven’t seen it already, go and see “The Hangover” to get what I mean.

Each decade you can pretty much pinpoint a team that’s head and shoulders above the rest. In the 80’s it was the Lakers and their “Showtime” brand of basketball. In the 90’s it was Jordan’s Bulls that possessed the greatest player and greatest coach in modern history (ever?) wowing fans every night and re-inventing basketball as we know it.

In the 00’s however, the situation is not so easy. There are clearly two teams that stick out above the others, the Spurs and the Lakers, but separating the two is no trivial matter. Well, that is until you dig a little bit deeper, start analysing the finer points, and be a little more.… Well… Biased!!! The truth is these two teams are inseparable depending on which angle you come from BUT I’m a Spurs fan, I’m looking from a Spurs angle, and here’s why my team is better.

Kobe and Duncan crossed paths almost every year in the '00's. If they didn't, one of the teams still went to the Western Conference Finals.

Kobe and Duncan crossed paths almost every year in the '00's. If they didn't, one of the teams still went to the Western Conference Finals.

Sheer winning percentage

When you talk about the winningest teams, the name that automatically springs to mind is the Spurs. They’re there, every year, every season, without fail. Over the past 9 seasons encompassing the 00’s, the Spurs ARE the winningest team in the NBA with an impressive 576 – 244 win/loss record (.702). The Lakers of the 80’s had a winning record of 531 – 207 (.719) while the Bulls of the 90’s had a winning record of 503 – 203 (.712). This places the Spurs in pretty elite company with a win/loss record over 70% for a decade. Can the ’00 Lakers boast a similar feat? No, they come in at 64%. This poor showing by the Lakers brings me to my next point.

Consistency, consistency, consistency…

Speaking of consistency - Duncan's 15 foot bank shot was a headache for the Lakers throughout the '00's with/without Shaq

Speaking of consistency - Duncan's 15 foot bank shot was a headache for the Lakers throughout the '00's with/without Shaq

People like to say the Spurs are a boring team to watch. Sure, if you get sick of watching a team constantly win easily, methodically, and barely ever look stressed. Seriously though, in the Spurs past 10 seasons they’ve made the playoffs every time. The Lakers have only missed once, but they’ve also been the 8th seed twice. The Spurs have never been lower than 5th seed, and have made the NBA finals 3 times. At this point the Laker fans are yelling “Hah!!! But we made the finals 6 times, so ner!!” That’s all lovely and good, but when the Spurs make the Finals they win 100% of the time, the Lakers on the other hand, win 66% of the time. Also add to that 50+ win seasons – the Spurs are, once again, a perfect 100% on 50+ win seasons whereas the Lakers are 70%. They may have more titles but have hardly been a team that you can constantly say “are a Championship team.”

Luxury Tax

The Lakers are the owners of arguably the best area code when it comes to luring in talent. They’re a huge market, have celebs a plenty attending their matches, and there are certain “financial benefits” to playing in a big city (e.g. endorsements).This has meant the Lakers have always lured in the “big names” at free agent/trade time. Whether it’s because the NBA is corrupt and makes sure the biggest market can win, or whether it’s the Lakers owners’ constant willingness to go over the luxury tax threshold, the Lakers keep reeling in the big names. O’Neal. Malone. Payton. Grant. Odom. Gasol. Couple that with Kobe Bryant and you’re almost playing unfairly. In fact, you are playing unfairly. If you look at the Lakers team of the 00’s they’re always over the luxury tax threshold which is essentially another way of saying “cheating” except your owner pays for it. The Spurs on the other hand have never flirted with the luxury tax mark, making smart trades and key acquisitions to ensure the line isn’t broken. If the Spurs did do that then who knows who else they could have had on the roster the years they just missed the finals; Maggette, Carter, McGrady, Allen, Iverson etc. All things being equal, which they never are with the Lakers, this makes the Spurs a better team on par.

One-dimensionality

The Lakers have shown their one-dimensionality all too often as eluded too by the above topic of tax. If the Lakers “stars” aren’t healthy and producing then the Lakers don’t win. The Spurs on the other hand are a true “team” in that Tim Duncan can go down and the Spurs are still a shot at winning. The 2005 Spurs lost Duncan for the final part of the season, and again in the West semi-finals only to bounce back and win the whole thing. I think this is the final point that proves the Spurs are the TEAM of the 00’s whereas the Lakers are the “chequebook” of the 00’s. No Kobe (since Shaq left), No Shaq (when he was there), No way.

Something the Lakers only do if they're losing - the Spurs of the '00's had so many ways to beat you the bench often contained their starting 5

Something the Lakers only do if they're losing - the Spurs of the '00's had so many ways to beat you the bench often contained their starting 5

The Spurs truly are a team that this past decade could never be written off. Even just last season in 2007 no one expected them to make the second round of the playoffs, let alone the conference finals, yet they did and did so pushing the Lakers (who’d only recently got the chequebook out AGAIN to get in Pau Gasol in a rip-off that screamed “NBA tampering” to have a Lakers-Celtics finals) to 6 games with 10 healthy players. Yep if you look back at the 00’s you’ll definitely say Kobe and Shaq were awesome, but you’ll still be left saying “but you never could go past those Spurs.” That’s why they were the team of the 00’s and will remembered as such.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.